﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://catalogues.royalsociety.org:443/CalmView/record/catalog/HSF/3/23/65" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <dc:title>Letter from W F H [William Francis Herschel] Waterfield, Bramshaw, Brachnell, to 'Dear Uncle Herschel' [Sir William James Herschel]</dc:title>
  <dc:description>He is delayed in sending back the pamphlet borrowed from his uncle. He gathered from what Sir William had said, that the pamphlet was a tirade by Mr. [Arthur Robert] Hicks against statistical methods in astronomical computation. He found that it was only a short resume of William Herschel's life, with just a note on such methods. He thinks there are points in favour of statistical methods, giving the example of [Arthur] Eddington's discussion of two drift theory of stellar motion. He enumerates Eddington's facts, stating that his ideas should be considered true until fresh facts emerge.   </dc:description>
  <dc:date>no date [1912?]</dc:date>
</rdf:Description>