﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://catalogues.royalsociety.org:443/CalmView/record/catalog/MS/603/10/106" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <dc:title>Letter from E H [Edward Hutchinson] Synge, Knockroe, Dundrum, Co Dublin, to Sir Joseph Larmor</dc:title>
  <dc:description>Synge will see about having the notebooks sent over to Larmor, but he may have to bring them over himself. He is not convinced by Larmor's belief that [William Rowan] Hamilton's researches on the Dynamics of Light were unimportant. He transcribes a letter from Hamilton to [George Biddell] Airy of 23 September 1836 and comments upon [Augustin Louis] Cauchy's obsolete theory. Synge discusses his own acquaintance with the theory of light from 'some years ago', and he thinks there is a strong case for Hamilton's theory to be examined and compared with [Augustin Jean] Fresnel's. This relates to Hamilton's early work, and Synge describes Hamilton's later work of 1839-1840, noting a letter to [John Frederick William] Herschel. He has a strong feeling that something of importance has been missed. In a postscript, Synge asks if in the mechanics of Hamilton's theory, there might be grounds for the supposition that light travels in 'quanta'.      </dc:description>
  <dc:date>22 September 1923</dc:date>
</rdf:Description>