﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://catalogues.royalsociety.org:443/CalmView/record/catalog/MS/603/2/151" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <dc:title>Letter from James Dewar, Royal Institution of Great Britain, London, to [Joseph] Larmor</dc:title>
  <dc:description>Dewar, having had no reply to the question posed in his letter of the 16 January, concludes that Larmor 'deliberately declined my proposals' and is acting in a way that he describes as a 'breach of honour'. He infers that Larmor desires publicity, in spite of Dewar's objections about bringing the matter before Council or a Committee. He thinks that the Society generally should be 'enlightened' so that he may receive adequate condemnation or acquittal.</dc:description>
  <dc:date>20 January 1907</dc:date>
</rdf:Description>