﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://catalogues.royalsociety.org:443/CalmView/record/catalog/MS/603/3/103" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <dc:title>Letter from Geo Fras [George Francis] Fitzgerald, Eng Coll [Engineering College] Cooper's Hill, for University of London,  to [Joseph] Larmor</dc:title>
  <dc:description>He received Larmor's letter in London. The difficulty was one of tact, not science, on how to tell Lord Kelvin that 'he is rooting at a mare's nest that has been rifled'. There can be no doubt that a nonconductor and ohmic resistance would ultimately set a conductor in motion. He notes 'Rowland's case' which would not apply to atoms, and would not explain rotation, and therefore not leading to Kelvin's solution, but to [Hendrik] Lorentz's. The Becquerel-Kelvon view is untenable, he believes. In a postscript, he wonders what sort of person woudl be needed to succeed Kelvin at Glasgow, not supposing that [Oliver] Lodge would be interested.    </dc:description>
  <dc:date>19 July 1899</dc:date>
</rdf:Description>