<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://catalogues.royalsociety.org:443/CalmView/record/catalog/MS/603/3/134" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <dc:title>Letter from A R [Andrew Russell] Forsyth, Trinity College, Cambridge, to [Joseph] Larmor</dc:title>
  <dc:description>Forsyth asks if it would be possible for [Edward Parnall] Culverwell's paper to be refereed by those who saw his other papers on the subject. Forsyth was not one of them. As the paper consists of parts 7-8, he thinks it would be better assessed by those familar with parts 1-6. In any event he has little time as the next volume of [Arthur] Cayley's papers should be got out soon.    </dc:description>
  <dc:date>22 November 1895</dc:date>
</rdf:Description>