﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://catalogues.royalsociety.org:443/CalmView/record/catalog/MS/603/7/103" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <dc:title>Letter from Horace Lamb, 6 Wilbraham Road, Fellowfield, Manchester, to [Joseph] Larmor</dc:title>
  <dc:description>He does not think there need be much delay in the Hopkins award. [Ernest William] Hobson's papers on spherical harmonics are anterior to the named period, but that may not matter. If preference is given to applied mathematics, then [Augustus Edward Hough] Love and [James Hopwood] Jeans have important papers in the 1901-3 period. The latter would have a strong case. Larmor's letter gave the first hint of the true reason for [Andrew Russell] Forsyth's resignation, but there was a word that Lamb could not decipher, and the whole thing is mysterious; it seems 'an inexplicable disaster'. He hopes the Trinity people will waive the resignation. On Royal Society candidates, the only competition seems to be among the physicists. [Ernest William] Barnes and [Frederick] Soddy have striong claims, and he briefly discusses [Alfred] Fowler, [Godfrey Harold] Hardy, [Louis Napoleon George] Filon, and [Richard Cockburn] Maclaurin. Among engineers, he favours [George Gerald] Stoney. [William Ernest] Dalby is astute but Lamb does not think much of him.   </dc:description>
  <dc:date>9 February 1910</dc:date>
</rdf:Description>