﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://catalogues.royalsociety.org:443/CalmView/record/catalog/MS/603/7/104" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <dc:title>Letter from Horace Lamb, 6 Wilbraham Road, Fellowfield, Manchester, to [Joseph] Larmor</dc:title>
  <dc:description>His opinion of the claims of  [Ernest William] Hobson and Baker [?] is not worth much. He has read the former's work, the latter's is beyond him. Hobson is more impressive, he thinks. As regards the Royal Society, he lists [Ernest William] Barnes, [Alfred] Fowler, [Godfrey Harold] Hardy and [Frederick] Soddy for his definite support. He does not think much about [Louis Napoleon George] Filon. Among engineers, he prefers [George Gerald] Stoney to [Bertram] Hopkinson. He know little about [Alfred William] Porter but prefers him to C.G. [Cargill Gilston] Knott. Lamb mentions [Frederick George] Donnan, does not support [Richard Cockburn] Maclaurin. [Richard Dixon] Oldham might be considered for geology and seismology. The chemists prefer [John Theodore] Hewitt and A J [Adrian John] Brown.  </dc:description>
  <dc:date>14 February 1910</dc:date>
</rdf:Description>