<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://catalogues.royalsociety.org:443/CalmView/record/catalog/NLB/10/524" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <dc:title>Copy letter from Herbert Rix, to Professor Michael Foster</dc:title>
  <dc:description>Major [Percy Alexander] MacMahon has promised to undertake the obituary notice of Colonel R Y Armstrong and Rix told him it would not be necessary to write to Foster. 

Discusses a discrepancy in the card of probable Councils and shall not send the cards out until he sees Foster. 

Captain [William James Ward] Wharton has reported unfavourably regarding the Russian letter and Rix has kept this for next Thursday.

Incloses a letter from Baron von Mueller which is more or less personal and has not replied [not attached]. 

Blakesley's letter in todays 'Times' is not ingenuous. Blakesley never had a paper before the Society.

Kim Boon Keng's paper has been with Professor [Charles Smart] Roy 'just' one year and two weeks. </dc:description>
  <dc:date>11 December 1894</dc:date>
</rdf:Description>