﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://catalogues.royalsociety.org:443/CalmView/record/catalog/NLB/15/739" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <dc:title>Copy letter from Arthur William Rucker, to Richard Tetley Glazebrook, [Fellow of the Royal Society]</dc:title>
  <dc:description>Thinks it best to send the two reports on [Victor Herbert] Veley's paper to Glazebrook. [William Augustus] Tilden showed him the curves and Rucker thinks they show nothing but the one great break at about 96 percent. Tilden makes no definite recommendation regarding the paper and Glazebrook might ask him whether he recommends the '[Philosophical] Transactions [of the Royal Society]' with the changes suggested, or the archives. If the latter they must have a third referee appointed at the next Committee. </dc:description>
  <dc:date>29 November 1897</dc:date>
</rdf:Description>