﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://catalogues.royalsociety.org:443/CalmView/record/catalog/PP/3/33" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <dc:title>Paper, 'Reply to a note by Professor J E [James Emerson] Reynolds on the atomic weight of glucinum or beryllium' by T S Humpidge</dc:title>
  <dc:description>Humpidge writes: 'In the above-mentioned note of Professor Reynolds [see PP/3/23] the author criticises the results detailed in a paper which I recently had the honour to contribute to the Society, and draws an inference from the specific heats of different specimens of the metal which I cannot admit to be founded on facts. Professor Reynolds remarks that all the results obtained by Nilson and myself tend in one direction, viz., to a considerable, though irregular, rise in the specific heat as the impurities diminish.'

Annotations in pencil and ink.

Subject: Chemistry

Received 7 June 1883. Read 21 June 1883. Communicated by [Edward] Frankland.

A version of this paper was published in volume 35 of the Proceedings of the Royal Society as 'Reply to a note by Professor J. E. Reynolds on the atomic weight of glucinum or beryllium'.</dc:description>
  <dc:date>1883</dc:date>
</rdf:Description>