﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://catalogues.royalsociety.org:443/CalmView/record/catalog/RR/13/81" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <dc:title>Referee's report by Edwin Bailey Elliott on a paper 'Memoir on the theory of the partition of numbers. Part I' by Percy Alexander MacMahon </dc:title>
  <dc:description>He would like to know if the last investigation in the memoir is really a second proof or only an investigation valuable for its own sake . If the latter is true, this passage should be re-worded.

Subject: Mathematics

[Published in Philosophical Transactions A, 1896].</dc:description>
  <dc:date>17 June 1896</dc:date>
</rdf:Description>