﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://catalogues.royalsociety.org:443/CalmView/record/catalog/RR/16/378" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <dc:title>Referee's report by John Henry Poynting, on a paper 'The role of diffucion in the catalysis of hydrogen peroxide by colloidal platinum' by George Senter</dc:title>
  <dc:description>Sectional Committee: not stated. 

He has written to Sand asking if he would wish to say anything if Senter's paper were published and Sand replied that he would not. Encloses Sand's letter [not attached] from which he can see Sand has extracted some meaning from the paper, and has thus been more successful than Poynting himself. Poynting thinks it a 'most woolly' production but as it contains a new point, according to Sand, Poynting supposes it ought to be published. 

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1904].

Endorsed on recto as received 17 March 1905. </dc:description>
  <dc:date>16 March 1905</dc:date>
</rdf:Description>