﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://catalogues.royalsociety.org:443/CalmView/record/catalog/RR/16/99" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <dc:title>Referee's report by Charles James Martin, on a paper  'The physiological action and antidotes of Colubrine and Viperine snake venoms' by Leonard Rogers</dc:title>
  <dc:description>Sectional Committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. The paper does not strike Martin as being particularly original nor as complete as the title suggests. It appears however to be a conscientious piece of work which will be useful, and as it is of much greater length than papers usually printed in Proceedings, he has answered question one in the affirmative. 

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions B, 1905].

Endorsed on verso as received 10 December 1903. </dc:description>
  <dc:date>December 1903</dc:date>
</rdf:Description>