﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://catalogues.royalsociety.org:443/CalmView/record/catalog/RR/21/65" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <dc:title>Referee's report by Sydney Howard Vines, on a paper 'A comparative study of oxidation by catalysts of organic and inorganic origin' by Alfred James Ewart</dc:title>
  <dc:description>Sectional Committee: Botany

Not recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Does not consider that the paper makes a significant advance in knowledge. Suggests that the paper should be reviewed by a biochemist. If the other referee recommends publication, he will defer to their opinion, but will suggest that the paper be significantly revised to correct poor structure. Would suggests the Proceedings as a more suitable place for publication. 

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1914]

Endorsed on verso as received 17 February 1914.</dc:description>
  <dc:date>14 February 1914</dc:date>
</rdf:Description>