﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://catalogues.royalsociety.org:443/CalmView/record/catalog/RR/28/57" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <dc:title>Referee's report by James Walker, on a paper 'Electrolytic conduction: sequel to an attempt (1886) to apply a theory of residual affinity' by Henry Edward Armstrong</dc:title>
  <dc:description>Sectional Committee: Chemistry

Not recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Does not consider the paper suitable for printing by the Royal Society, although it should be read. Suggests it is more suitable as a letter to Nature or Chemistry and Industry.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London' A, 1923]

Endorsed on verso as received 11 May 1923.</dc:description>
  <dc:date>[May 1923]</dc:date>
</rdf:Description>