﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://catalogues.royalsociety.org:443/CalmView/record/catalog/RR/55/47" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <dc:title>Referee's report by Arthur George Tansley, on a paper 'A study by statistical methods of the distribution of species in grassland associations' by Geoffrey Emett Blackman</dc:title>
  <dc:description>Sectional committee: Botany

Not recommended for publication. The paper contains 'no satisfactory analysis' and some of his statements are misleading. Most of the paper is inconclusive. Re-writing the paper probably won't fix the problem. The result is worth publishing, but the description is 'diffuse and somewhat confusing'. 

[Not published].

Endorsed on verso as received 4 June 1935.</dc:description>
  <dc:date>3 June 1935</dc:date>
</rdf:Description>