﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://catalogues.royalsociety.org:443/CalmView/record/catalog/RR/68/480" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <dc:title>Referee's report by William Henry Lang, on a paper 'A revision of Williamsoniella' by Thomas Maxwell Harris</dc:title>
  <dc:description>Sectional Committee: Botany

Recommended for publication in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. The work is clear and well presented. Has no special knowledge of the fossils which 'would warrant any more special comments'. 

Contains extra question - 'Is there any information contained in the paper which likely to be of value to the enemy?' Referee replies no.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society]

No received date.</dc:description>
  <dc:date>[1944]</dc:date>
</rdf:Description>