﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://catalogues.royalsociety.org:443/CalmView/record/catalog/RR/75" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <dc:title>Referees' reports: volume 75, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication</dc:title>
  <dc:description>Containing referee's reports for the 'A' side (biological sciences) papers submitted to the Royal Society for review in 1951. Arranged chronologically by date of receipt of the paper at the Society. 

Notable referees and authors include 

When report is on a standardised form (E),  the questions are:
1. Whether or not the paper should be read before the Society
2. Whether the paper contains contributions to knowledge of sufficient scientific interest for the space required
3. Whether any portions or illustrations of the paper are redundant
4. Whether it should be published by the Society
5. Whether it should be published in 'Philosophical Transactions' or 'Proceedings'
6.Whether it could be published by some other body
7. General remarks</dc:description>
  <dc:date>1951</dc:date>
</rdf:Description>