﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://catalogues.royalsociety.org:443/CalmView/record/catalog/TG/1/3/368" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <dc:title>Letter from Thomas Gold to Dr Gordon MacDonald, Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, California</dc:title>
  <dc:description>Says that 'I am keen to have people understand what I said and not what newspapers or other uninformed sources said I said.  Since it is now pretty clear that the maria are covered by a flat layer of a deposit of soft 'soil' and not by a frozen lava, I would of course prefer if the propaganda did not continue to say that I was wrong.  I really cannot think of a Surveyor result that could have been more like what I thought and wrote in the past.  I only pointed out that there was a risk of such deposits being very soft (and there still is!) but that mostly vacuum welding will have made it a crunchy and not a flowing substance'.  </dc:description>
  <dc:date>10 June 1966</dc:date>
</rdf:Description>