Record

PP - Proceedings Papers
- 2 - Scientific papers published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society volume 34, 1882-1883

RefNo	PP/2/1
Previous numbers	PP/34/1
Level	Item
Title	Paper, 'On the formation of ripplemark' by Arthur Roope Hunt
Creator	Hunt; Arthur Roope (1843-1915); British geologist
Date	1882
Description	Hunt writes: 'Fossil ripplemarks are often appealed to by geologists as evidence that the winds and waves that formed them cannot have differed much in intensity from those that produce similar corrugations on the sands of our modern beaches; but, although considerable value is attached to the evidence afforded by these relics of ancient seas, authorities differ much as to their origin. According to Sir Charles Lyell ripplemark originates in the “drifting of materials along the bottom of the water,” and “is usually an indication of a sea beach, or of water from 6 to 10 feet in depth, though this rule he proceeds to say is not without exception, as recent ripplemarks have been observed at the depth of 60 or 70 feet. The crossing of two sets of ripples the distinguished author ascribes to the new direction in which the waves are thrown on the shore consequent on a change of wind (“Elements of Geology,” 6th edition, p. 19). Mr. J. Beete Jukes, in the first edition of his “Manual of Geology,” states, that current mark or ripple “is produced on the sea beach, not in consequence of the ripple of the wave impressing its own form on the sand below, which would be an impossibility, but because the moving current of water as the tide advances or recedes produces on the surface of the sand below the same form as the moving current of air produces on the surface of the water above. A rippled surface, therefore, to a rock is no proof of its having been necessarily formed in shallow water, though rippled surfaces are perhaps more frequently formed there, but simply a proof of a current in the water sufficient to move the sand at its bottom gently along, at whatever depth that bottom may be from the surface of the water.” Speaking of fossil ripplemarks the same author states that the distance from crest to crest of the ridges varies from half an inch to eight or ten inches, with a proportionate variation in depth between them (Jukes’ “ Man. Geol.,” p. 172). The article on ripplemark is recast in the third edition, edited by Dr. Geikie and published in 1872, but the views expressed therein are the same.' Annotations in pencil and ink. Subject: Palaeontology / Geology Received 28 March 1882. Read 20 April 1882. Communicated by Lord Rayleigh. A version of this paper was published in volume 34 of the Proceedings of the Royal Society as 'On the formation of ripplemark'.
Extent	28p
Format	Manuscript
PhysicalDescription	Ink and graphite pencil on paper
Digital images	View item on Science in the Making
AccessStatus	Open
RelatedMaterial	DOI: 10.1098/rspl.1882.0001

Fellows associated with this archive

Code	PersonName	Dates
NA6090	Strutt; John William (1842 - 1919); 3rd Baron Rayleigh	1842 - 1919

Add to My Items

Photographs of British algae: cyanotype impressions

Photographs of British algae: cyanotype impressions

Tweets by theRCN

Early Letters

Botanical paintings by Jacob van Huysum and William Sartorius

Botanical paintings by Jacob van Huysum and William Sartorius

Photographs of British algae: cyanotype impressions

Photographs of British algae: cyanotype impressions

New Letter Books

New Letter Books

Browse Collections